Linux and photography

For many years pho­tog­ra­phy and linux have not been the best friends. But it seems, as if this has changed.

This week I did some­thing which seemed impos­si­ble until now. I kicked Windows.

No more XP/64, no more 7/64. Go figure.

DigiKam 1.4

Finally there are linux-replacements for the have-to-have-apps like Adobe PS and LR. Now I use Digikam (cur­rently 1.4, see screen­shot above) to manage/edit all my pho­tos, Gimp (2.7, devel) as addi­tional editing-software and also Krita, which has some poten­tial. And the Kipi-plugins are a real time-saver for re-occuring tasks.

The 8-bit-barrier has been over­come by Digikam and Krita, which both can han­dle 16-bit-files. And I am sure that it is only a ques­tion of time, until Gimp can too. This was a big step ahead. Also the han­dling of RAW-files has become very easy — as well as imple­ment­ing color-profiles. Now I can say, that there is hardly a rea­son — at least for even ambi­tious ama­teurs — to shell out lots of money for com­mer­cial prod­ucts. On a side­note: This is also true for video-editing. My rec­om­men­da­tion: KDEnlive…

Dur­ing the years I had many linux-distributions on my HD, but there is one that I always come back to. So… there must be a rea­son ;) It is Arch/64.  Hard to beat speed-wise and there are tons of fresh apps for any pur­pose you can think of.

If you want an overview on what the alter­na­tives for bread-and-butter-apps on win­dows are, I sug­gest that you have a look at this site.

ps. When I said, there is no more win­dows, this was not all true. I still run xp/32 in a vir­tual machine even­tu­ally, as there is one pro­gram I could not replace: Nokia PC Suite. I need it to sync my mobile phone. But this is easy and works well.

In case you’re interested…

- Very com­pre­hen­sive arti­cle by Nathan Willis

33 Comments

  1. Hi, I use Ubuntu in gnome desk­top, I’ve been try­ing bib­ble 5 till I ran into digikam, but I’ve been look­ing around in forums try­ing to find out if there is no draw­back in installing it in my gnome plat­form since it is intended for kde pri­mar­ily. I want to know if it is worth the try and if it has more friendly and easy to use fea­tures than bib­ble, I’m no pro­fes­sional pho­tog­ra­pher, only into the ama­teur thing, but look­ing for a good app in ubuntu for man­ag­ing and edit­ing my pic­tures (shotwell and f-spot out of the ques­tion). So can you give me your com­ments about this two? and if I use digikam on my gnome can I still have all the fea­tures it has on kde? thanks

    • Michael

      Hi,

      the short answer is: yes.

      The “prob­lem” with installing KDE-apps in Gnome and vice versa is: when you do so, your sys­tem will pull some KDE-libraries as well, as the apps needs them to work. this is not prob­lem­atic, but some peo­ple just don’t want that to hap­pen. it is more about ide­ol­ogy IMHO. But basi­cally you can install any KDE-app in Gnome and any Gnome-app in KDE.

    • Thanks a lot, and about the com­par­i­son between bib­ble and digikam, what do you think are the pros and cons?

    • Michael

      Hi

      sorry, I do not know Bib­ble well. I used it some years ago, but only for short time. I have never tested it thor­oughly. As fas as I know it is not free either whereas Digikam is.

      But if you are look­ing for an appli­ca­tion that does not rely on KDE you should def­i­nitely have a look at Dark­table.

  2. So we are on the same boat. When you need pro­fes­sional work flow then Linux’s _software_ isn’t good enough. That said, Linux (as a sys­tem) is not good enough for pro­fes­sional photography.

    In my pic­tures there is a lot of fea­tures that can­not be done in one Linux pro­gram. Yes, you can do gra­di­ents and even add grain with dif­fer­ent pro­grams, but when want­ing a straight for­ward work flow, you need one good pro­gram that does them all.

  3. I’m sorry, but Linux is nowhere near Light­room 3 or some other Windows/Mac based pro­grams. Yes, you can browse your images with Linux and even browse, but get­ting pro­fes­sional result pho­tog­ra­phy. In your dreams.

    Don’t get me wrong, I love Linux. I even write this with my Linux com­puter. But for pho­tog­ra­phy — no way!

    • Michael

      …you can browse your images with Linux and even browse…

      I think you meant browse and edit, right?

      Any­way, I’d like to con­tra­dict and say, that Digikam with some Kipi-Plugins has come very close to Light­room. I would not say it drew level with it, but things have changed a lot dur­ing the last years. For some­one who does not have the money to get the Adobe Prod­ucts the var­i­ous linux-tools are an alter­na­tive. There are short­com­ings of course and I wrote about that too.

      Per­son­ally I went back to edit­ing my stuff on 7/64 in the mean­time because a) my work­flow is much smoother and faster with my usual tools and b) I’ve paid quite a lot of money for apps and plu­g­ins both for LR and PS and I don’t like lost investments.

      I do not agree that you can­not get pro­fes­sional results with linux-tools (not linux, that’s an OS). You sure can, but it may take some more time and more steps and some workarounds. If you don’t mind that and have the time, you’ll be fine.

      BTW: No offense, mate, but in your gallery I see noth­ing that could not be done eas­ily with Digikam, Gimp, Dark­table, Imagemag­ick and alike…

  4. KDEfanboy

    gald to find this site .. me run­ning KDE 4.5.2 with digikam 1.4.0
    i am lov­ing it… I have Fuji­film Finepix HS10 super zoom cam­era… where most tool fail to open the raf (RAW) files even on win­dows .. it works like a charm on linux :) Great blog … for some rea­son can­not install dark­table .. errors with repo .… Eagerly wait­ing for digikam 1.5.0 to hit the repos :D

    • Michael

      Hi

      great that you can process your files on linux so much eas­ier. ;)
      But just in case: Adobe sup­ports RAF since ACR 6.2, at least that’s what they say.

  5. gychang

    thanks for such help­ful arti­cle. Presently using LR3 and PS4. I enjoy the linux plat­form and agree the linux is get­ting close for seri­ous photo work,

    gychang

  6. Toby Haynes

    I find hugin an indis­pens­able part of my dig­i­tal dark­room. For cor­rect­ing vignetting, cor­rect­ing lens dis­tor­tion, com­bin­ing panora­mas and doing HDR work, it is outstanding.

    http://hugin.sf.net/

    • Michael

      I bet for panoramic images there is noth­ing better.

    • Toby Haynes

      I think it’s fairly safe to state that for image qual­ity, Hugin is the best of the panoramic tools, even when com­pared to com­mer­cial tools on other plat­forms. It may not be quite as easy to use as Autopano Pro or as fast, but even there it is improving.

      And because it can exam­ine your lenses and save the cal­i­bra­tions away for future use, you can cal­i­brate your lenses using a panoramic pic­ture and then apply the same cor­rec­tions to all your pho­tos, allow­ing you to remove the dis­tor­tions and vignetting (and even pur­ple fring­ing). from your collection.

  7. jo

    I’m a big fan of Digikam myself. But as a replace­ment for LR you should also give Dark­room and Raw­stu­dio a look.

    • Michael

      I am sure, you mean Darktable, right?

      I just built the git-version and played with it for a while and like it ;) But I’ll have a closer look soon. Raw­stu­dio is on my test-list as well. I used it some years ago, but wasn’t happy with it. Guess it has made some progress in the meantime…

  8. Earl Parker II

    For basic, speedy and intu­itive photo edit­ing, try fotoxx. Find it at http://kornelix.squarespace.com/fotoxx or a repos­i­tory near you.

  9. Ra

    I like that peo­ple are start­ing to use Linux.

    • Michael

      Nice ;)

      But actu­ally I did not start to use it, as I always had a linux on my machine dur­ing the last almost 20 years, but finally I free myself from the grip of Big Bill.

  10. Holger

    This is a bet­ter start­page for cine­paint:
    http://cinepaint.bigasterisk.com/

    • Michael

      thanks, I’m aware of cinepaint/filmgimp, but these are rather old and as far as I can see they are not develöopped any­more.
      We’ll see how Krita develops.

  11. Holger

    Check out filmgimp/cinepaint for 16 bit sup­port http://sourceforge.net/projects/filmgimp/
    As an alter­na­tive there is stil krita:
    http://www.koffice.org/krita/

  12. It’s a bit off the topic but what’s the desk­top man­ager? It’s kind of cool!

  13. Privat Bruger

    I find that Bib­blepro from Bib­ble­labs nicely fills the space that Pho­to­shop leaves if one leaves Win­dows behind. It works on Win­dows, Mac and Linux. Unlike the poster, I do not find RAW han­dling on Linux very good. And I am get­ting kind of tired wait­ing for GIMP to catch up to 16 bit.

    • Michael

      What exactly don’t you like?

      Did you try to con­vert your camera-files from pro­prieary RAW to DNG?

  14. Scunizi

    I like digikam too. How­ever for edit­ing even on 64 bit it can be a lit­tle slow. Maybe it’s my machine, maybe not.. How­ever I’ve found a pro­gram that you’ll drool over but it’s not a replace­ment for digikam.. Digikam is a ter­iffic orga­ni­za­tional app.. For RAW and jpg manip­u­la­tion check out Dark­table. It’s young, very capa­ble, sup­ports teth­ered shoot­ing with sev­eral camera’s and offers a lot.. http://darktable.sourceforge.net/ (I’m a user not a dev.. )

    • Michael

      I read about it before and it is on my to-test-list. thanks any­way! ;)
      A gen­eral hint: I gained a lot of speed using KDE (4.5.1) by turn­ing off Nepo­muk and Akonadi (I don’t use KMail, KOr­ga­nizer etc.).

  15. Spanky

    DigiKam is the best!

    • Michael

      Yes­ter­day I con­verted (refor­mat­ted) my data-drives from ntfs to ext4. This is going to be the lit­mus test. Now we’ll see how well Digikam copes with 24.000 pho­tos. But I am con­fi­dent. ;)

  16. Esteban

    Loved your arti­cle. I still have to use Win­dows to pre­pare taxes. But other than that, I have made the move to Linux.
    Oh, your pho­tographs are Outstanding!

    • Michael

      Vir­tu­al­box could be a rem­edy for you. Speak­ing of taxes… I still have to do my dec­la­ra­tion for 2009. I just hate it! ;)
      But cer­tainly I’ll use XP in a vir­tual machine for it this year.

Leave a Reply